Author pmoody
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, drkjam, exarkun, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, shields
Date 2009-02-04.16:25:46
SpamBayes Score 2.46307e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <8517e9350902040825p7688703ycb9430363a3f16aa@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <498772F9.109@v.loewis.de>
Content
> I could live with such a choice if the netaddr authors agree that it
> is the right choice (them being experts themselves in the domain).
> I don't want to be accused of drkjam's accusation of fast-tracking
> code just because it comes from Google (which would be a false
> accusation regardless, but there is no reason to make some Python
> users unhappy because they feel they are subject to political games).

in light of david's email, would you agree that the bar for buy-in has
been met or should I now start writing a PEP and preparing offerings
for the BDFL?

Cheers,
/peter
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-04 16:25:48pmoodysetrecipients: + pmoody, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pnasrat, drkjam, oubiwann
2009-02-04 16:25:47pmoodylinkissue3959 messages
2009-02-04 16:25:46pmoodycreate