Message81129
Well spotted! I missed that when I checked. I will add tests and
documentation.
I agree that generic is better. I only left it as it was because the
original intent was simply to move the existing code - but that's not a
particularly good reason for keeping a clumsy name. There shouldn't be a
clash, as any more general mechanism can either be in its own module or
the existing function can be extended in a compatible manner. I'll make
this change too.
Thanks for the feedback! |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-04 08:10:25 | paul.moore | set | recipients:
+ paul.moore, ncoghlan, ryan.freckleton |
2009-02-04 08:10:25 | paul.moore | set | messageid: <1233735025.56.0.351831728829.issue5135@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-02-04 08:10:11 | paul.moore | link | issue5135 messages |
2009-02-04 08:10:09 | paul.moore | create | |
|