Message 80630 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ggenellina
Recipients	carlj, georg.brandl, ggenellina
Date	2009-01-27.07:20:44
SpamBayes Score	7.4202376e-08
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1233040846.31.0.231552641232.issue5062@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
The current behaviour is actually a requested feature: see #449227 I see your point, it may be annoying sometimes -- but calling a method is far more common than just getting a reference to it, so I think the current behaviour is fine (I'm talking about the added "(", not the repeated entries, nor the unneeded __bases__ recursion, nor the deleted entries)

The current behaviour is actually a requested feature: see #449227

I see your point, it may be annoying sometimes -- but calling a method 
is far more common than just getting a reference to it, so I think the 
current behaviour is fine (I'm talking about the added "(", not the 
repeated entries, nor the unneeded __bases__ recursion, nor the deleted 
entries)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-01-27 07:20:46	ggenellina	set	recipients: + ggenellina, georg.brandl, carlj
2009-01-27 07:20:46	ggenellina	set	messageid: <1233040846.31.0.231552641232.issue5062@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-27 07:20:44	ggenellina	link	issue5062 messages
2009-01-27 07:20:44	ggenellina	create