Author pitrou
Recipients jnoller, ndfred, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-01-22.23:20:40
SpamBayes Score 0.00581592
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1232666441.67.0.46789522609.issue4999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
That's why I was suggesting to leave Queue as it is and provide a
separate PriorityQueue. With a PriorityQueue the user is free to put
(timestamp, object) tuples in it if he wants a strict chronologic
ordering. He can also use sequence numbers instead of timestamps, etc.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-22 23:20:41pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, jnoller, ndfred
2009-01-22 23:20:41pitrousetmessageid: <1232666441.67.0.46789522609.issue4999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-22 23:20:40pitroulinkissue4999 messages
2009-01-22 23:20:40pitroucreate