Author pitrou
Recipients collinwinter, jyasskin, pitrou
Date 2009-01-13.23:25:27
SpamBayes Score 0.0234937
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1231889146.7109.6.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>

> I've backported condbranches-plus.patch to trunk, and I'm getting these 
> results:


> PyBench: 1.84-2.21% faster
> 2to3: 3.83% faster
> Spitfire: 6.13-6.23% faster

What is Spitfire?

> I've haven't tested condbranches.patch vs condbranches-plus.patch; what 
> difference are you seeing, Antoine?

condbranches.patch is the earlier version (without POP_OR_JUMP and
JUMP_OR_POP), it can be ignored.

> This patch mostly looks good, though you still need to change Doc/
> library/dis.rst and the pure-Python compiler package.

Well, the pure-Python compiler package doesn't exist in py3k, for which
I've initially made the patch.
(and its state in 2.x is very sorry...)
Date User Action Args
2009-01-13 23:25:27pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, collinwinter, jyasskin
2009-01-13 23:25:27pitroulinkissue4715 messages
2009-01-13 23:25:27pitroucreate