Author blaisorblade
Recipients ajaksu2, alexandre.vassalotti, bboissin, belopolsky, blaisorblade, christian.heimes, collinwinter, djc, facundobatista, gregory.p.smith, jyasskin, lemburg, pitrou, ralph.corderoy, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, spiv, theatrus
Date 2009-01-12.19:03:14
SpamBayes Score 0.00296767
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1231786995.7.0.133049493347.issue4753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
A couple percent maybe is not worth vmgen-ing. But even if I'm not a
vmgen expert, I read many papers from Ertl about superinstructions and
replication, so the expected speedup from vmgen'ing is much bigger.
Is there some more advanced feature we are not using and could use?
Have the previous static predictions be converted to superinstructions?
Have other common sequences be treated like that?
Is there an existing discussion on this?
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-12 19:03:16blaisorbladesetrecipients: + blaisorblade, lemburg, skip.montanaro, collinwinter, rhettinger, facundobatista, gregory.p.smith, spiv, belopolsky, pitrou, christian.heimes, ajaksu2, alexandre.vassalotti, jyasskin, djc, ralph.corderoy, bboissin, theatrus
2009-01-12 19:03:15blaisorbladesetmessageid: <1231786995.7.0.133049493347.issue4753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-12 19:03:14blaisorbladelinkissue4753 messages
2009-01-12 19:03:14blaisorbladecreate