Author rhettinger
Recipients facundobatista, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, steven.daprano
Date 2009-01-11.05:03:43
SpamBayes Score 0.159037
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1231650230.27.0.977428592917.issue4796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Go ahead with the update, but it isn't really necessary.  The PEPs are
for getting something into the language in the first place and for
centralizing a major discussion.  They typically get out of date quickly
after they've been implemented.  In this case, we've got the tracker
discussion to document the minor discussions than led to this minor
change in the API.  So, it's okay to update the PEP or not.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-11 05:03:52rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano
2009-01-11 05:03:50rhettingersetmessageid: <1231650230.27.0.977428592917.issue4796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-11 05:03:48rhettingerlinkissue4796 messages
2009-01-11 05:03:47rhettingercreate