Message79268
@ Mark
Concerning float('inf') * 1j: you're right, my rambling did not make any
sense, sorry.
I agree that adding complexity may be a good reason to warrant an
arbitrary feature; actually, I did not manage to handle nan/inf at first
because of the complexity :) But as I mentioned in a previous comment, I
think my patch simplifies the parsing as well. I suggested to split the
patch in to: one whithout any new feature (no handling of nan/inf), and
then anoter handling nan/inf on the top of it. Would that be acceptable ?
Also, how should I proceed to share implementation between floatobject.c
and complexobject.c ? Would creating a new file for the common code be
acceptable ? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-01-06 16:05:01 | cdavid | set | recipients:
+ cdavid, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes |
2009-01-06 16:05:00 | cdavid | set | messageid: <1231257900.98.0.221802927218.issue2121@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-01-06 16:05:00 | cdavid | link | issue2121 messages |
2009-01-06 16:05:00 | cdavid | create | |
|