This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gpolo, kermode, terry.reedy
Date 2009-01-02.21:50:46
SpamBayes Score 3.51511e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1230933048.07.0.185859184631.issue4793@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Based on my reading of the pydev discussion, the doc correctly describes
the design intent.  If there is any bug, it is in the optimization of
skipping the apparently redundant first name binding.  I presume the
thinking was that since the decorator gets the function as an input,
there is no sensible need to access it again via its name.  A conforming
implementation should be free to not do this optimization, but to simply
make the easy and obvious translation.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-01-02 21:50:48terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, georg.brandl, kermode, benjamin.peterson, gpolo
2009-01-02 21:50:48terry.reedysetmessageid: <1230933048.07.0.185859184631.issue4793@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-01-02 21:50:47terry.reedylinkissue4793 messages
2009-01-02 21:50:46terry.reedycreate