Message78182
> 2to3 doesn't deal with anything else that has been removed.
That seems a bit odd for me... isn't it the perfect place for that? (it
doesn't even need to change the code for a pass, but it could give the
user some warning about it at that specific line -- maybe with a pointer
to a place explaining why it was removed).
I think that if 2to3 flags it, it can make the porting cycle faster than
having to run the code (and expecting a huge code-coverage) to get those
-- especially as sys.exc_clear is mostly used in cases where you are
expecting some exception... and I believe not everyone gives as much
emphasis for exception cases as they'd for the cases in the 'regular flow' |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-12-22 13:44:53 | fabioz | set | recipients:
+ fabioz, georg.brandl, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
2008-12-22 13:44:53 | fabioz | set | messageid: <1229953493.85.0.258889083126.issue4719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-12-22 13:44:53 | fabioz | link | issue4719 messages |
2008-12-22 13:44:52 | fabioz | create | |
|