Author schmir
Recipients movement, rb, schmir
Date 2008-11-27.21:53:59
SpamBayes Score 0.00232651
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1227822862.45.0.0637383093085.issue4434@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, there is no purpose in linking with a static library when the
dynamically loaded modules still depend on the shared library.
And yes, the dynamically loaded libraries should declare their
dependencies. My point is they do *not* depend on the shared library.
That's why the static lib currently makes sense on ubuntu, but wouldn't
make any sense when your proposal would be implemented.

I recommend closing this issue as invalid.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-11-27 21:54:22schmirsetrecipients: + schmir, movement, rb
2008-11-27 21:54:22schmirsetmessageid: <1227822862.45.0.0637383093085.issue4434@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-11-27 21:53:59schmirlinkissue4434 messages
2008-11-27 21:53:59schmircreate