Author belopolsky
Recipients Neil Muller, andersjm, belopolsky, davidfraser, hodgestar, tebeka, vstinner, werneck
Date 2008-11-24.18:07:44
SpamBayes Score 0.0161299
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:34 PM, STINNER Victor <> wrote:
>> I would still prefer totimestamp()->(int, int) returning (sec, usec)
>> tuple.  The important benefit is that such totimestamp() will not
>> loose information
> Right, I prefer your solution ;-)

Great!  What do you think about extending fromtimestamp(timestamp[,
tz]) and utcfromtimestamp(timestamp) to accept a tuple for the

Also, are you motivated enough to bring this up on python-dev to get a
community and BDFL blessings?  I think this has a chance to be
Date User Action Args
2008-11-24 18:07:45belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, tebeka, davidfraser, andersjm, vstinner, werneck, hodgestar, Neil Muller
2008-11-24 18:07:44belopolskylinkissue2736 messages
2008-11-24 18:07:44belopolskycreate