This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, vstinner
Date 2008-11-11.01:38:29
SpamBayes Score 9.571755e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1226367513.06.0.326241776187.issue4294@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm unable to use pystone nor pybench to compare all integers patches. 
So I wrote my own tool: bench_int.py. Don't use to compare different 
computers or Python versions, it's just useful to test if a patch is 
faster or slower.

Example (still the 64 bits CPU@2.5 GHz):
-------------------------------
original     : 896.5 ms
 + macros    : 891.0 ms (+0.6%)
 ++ optimize : 884.3 ms (+1.4%)
 +++ shift   : 880.8 ms (+1.7%)
GMP          : 700.9 ms (+22%)
30 bits      : 659.9 ms (+26%)
-------------------------------

Result: my optimizations are useless, whereas mark's patch (#4258) is 
26% faster! My GMP patch is only 22% faster (and so slower than the 30 
bits patch). The GMP hack would only be useful for huge value whereas 
my benchmark tool use mostly small values (the biggest is near 
2**200).

I use it with "sync && ./python -OO bench_int.py", run the command 2 
or 3 times, and keep the smallest value.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-11-11 01:38:33vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes
2008-11-11 01:38:33vstinnersetmessageid: <1226367513.06.0.326241776187.issue4294@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-11-11 01:38:32vstinnerlinkissue4294 messages
2008-11-11 01:38:31vstinnercreate