This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, jnoller, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date 2008-09-01.22:11:25
SpamBayes Score 1.6161705e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1220307083.5602.9.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1220304137.57.0.970812175873.issue3589@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 21:22 +0000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> As Fredrik noted in the python-dev thread, the threading versions of
> these are already explicitly documented as being factory functions
> rather than classes (and as a reference to _thread.allocate_lock,
> threading.Lock has good reason to be a factory function rather than a
> class), so it may be appropriate to do the same thing for multiprocessing.

"Foolish consistency, etc.". :-)
I think we should fix this before the releases rather than live with a
stupid indirection that doesn't seem to serve any useful purposes.
Unless the fix is too complicated of course.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-09-01 22:11:26pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, jnoller
2008-09-01 22:11:25pitroulinkissue3589 messages
2008-09-01 22:11:25pitroucreate