This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gd2shoe
Recipients astrand, gd2shoe, ragnar
Date 2008-08-22.22:22:22
SpamBayes Score 3.982117e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1219443743.78.0.362271043126.issue1396825@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
This is just common sense.  I'm trying to avoid a poll() busy-wait
section of code.  I'll figure it out, but it would be much, much easier
if wait accepted a number of seconds, and returned None if the process
was still going (cf. Popen.poll() ).

I'm much happier with subprocess than os.popen*.  I'm also glad that
Popen.kill() is slated for 3.0 .

Since this isn't in the 3.0b3 documentation, I assume this either isn't
fixed or planned?  Are there implementation difficulties?
History
Date User Action Args
2008-08-22 22:22:24gd2shoesetrecipients: + gd2shoe, astrand, ragnar
2008-08-22 22:22:23gd2shoesetmessageid: <1219443743.78.0.362271043126.issue1396825@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-22 22:22:23gd2shoelinkissue1396825 messages
2008-08-22 22:22:22gd2shoecreate