Author pitrou
Recipients esrever_otua, facundobatista, jcea, loewis, pitrou
Date 2008-08-22.09:23:45
SpamBayes Score 0.000657902
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Well, it's definitely a bug, or inconsistency, if you like, between
> cPickle and pickle.

There is clearly a problem with cPickle stack consumption and a new bug has been
opened for this in #3640.

What I don't agree with is your argument that pickle and cPickle should have the
same recursion limits - it's just "foolish consistency" to ask for identical
behaviour on such a low-level and implementation-dependent issue.
Date User Action Args
2008-08-22 09:23:46pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, facundobatista, jcea, esrever_otua
2008-08-22 09:23:45pitroulinkissue3338 messages
2008-08-22 09:23:45pitroucreate