Author mgiuca
Recipients ddvoinikov, georg.brandl, mgiuca, pitrou
Date 2008-08-20.10:47:43
SpamBayes Score 6.96598e-12
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1219229265.09.0.717680500247.issue3613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> > it should be renamed to encodestring
> Huh ? It is already called that :)

Um ... yes. I mean encodebytes :)

> > Best we can do is document them.
> Oh well.

But I don't know the rules. People are saying things like "no new
features after beta3" but I take it that
backwards-compatibility-breaking changes are included in this.

But maybe it's still OK for us to break code after the beta. Perhaps
someone involved in the release can comment on this issue (and hopefully
with a view to my array patch - http://bugs.python.org/issue3565 - as well).
History
Date User Action Args
2008-08-20 10:47:45mgiucasetrecipients: + mgiuca, georg.brandl, pitrou, ddvoinikov
2008-08-20 10:47:45mgiucasetmessageid: <1219229265.09.0.717680500247.issue3613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-20 10:47:44mgiucalinkissue3613 messages
2008-08-20 10:47:43mgiucacreate