Message 71482 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rupole
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, rupole
Date	2008-08-19.20:58:03
SpamBayes Score	0.0031358227
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1219179485.33.0.324551767865.issue3453@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
This doesn't address the discrepancy between tp_base and tp_bases. If multiple bases are used, it's no longer 'good practice', it's an absolute requirement. IMO, it should call PyType_Ready for all bases, or none of them. Since the code assumes that all bases have been initialized, it could at least ASSERT so, rather than crashing deep within the mro calculations.

This doesn't address the discrepancy between tp_base and tp_bases.
If multiple bases are used, it's no longer 'good practice', it's an
absolute requirement.  IMO, it should call PyType_Ready for all bases, 
or none of them.

Since the code assumes that all bases have been
initialized, it could at least ASSERT so, rather than crashing deep
within the mro calculations.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-19 20:58:05	rupole	set	recipients: + rupole, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson
2008-08-19 20:58:05	rupole	set	messageid: <1219179485.33.0.324551767865.issue3453@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-19 20:58:04	rupole	link	issue3453 messages
2008-08-19 20:58:03	rupole	create