➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan
Date 2008-08-19.15:34:55
SpamBayes Score 0.001304957
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1219160096.2.0.499511557815.issue3352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
t.alive:" anyway.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-08-19 15:34:56ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13
2008-08-19 15:34:56ncoghlansetmessageid: <1219160096.2.0.499511557815.issue3352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-19 15:34:55ncoghlanlinkissue3352 messages
2008-08-19 15:34:55ncoghlancreate