Great!  The same cannot be said of the 3.0 version, which is on my plate.

I wonder if you have an opinion on what to do with features that were
initially targeted for 3.0 and then backported to 2.6.  Should these
appear in "what's new in 2.6", in "what's new in 3.0", or in both?  I'm
thinking that perhaps these should appear in both, for the benefit of
folks planning to jump straight into 3.0 from 2.5.  After all, 2.6 and
3.0 are coming out at the same time.  Or should be just add these to 2.6
and add a generic clause to the 3.0 document saying "also see the 2.6
document"?