This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson, fdrake, georg.brandl, gvanrossum
Date 2008-08-05.16:13:48
SpamBayes Score 0.013371137
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1217952889.62.0.299996880216.issue616013@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
2.6 should keep the original cPickle, warts and all, for backwards
compatibility.  I'd be okay though with also having _pickle there --
just don't call in cPickle (and don't import it from pickle.py either).
History
Date User Action Args
2008-08-05 16:14:49gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, fdrake, georg.brandl, alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson
2008-08-05 16:14:49gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1217952889.62.0.299996880216.issue616013@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-05 16:13:48gvanrossumlinkissue616013 messages
2008-08-05 16:13:48gvanrossumcreate