➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author facundobatista
Recipients facundobatista, tuben
Date 2008-07-11.02:55:24
SpamBayes Score 1.68998e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1215744927.47.0.792207347181.issue2674@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
That class is normally used at the end of the testing suite, as is
recommended in the documentation.

In any case, I don't see that like a bug, so we shouldn't be changing
that behaviour, because of compatibility.

What do you think? Maybe the documentation should be more explicit about
this? Thanks!
History
Date User Action Args
2008-07-11 02:55:28facundobatistasetspambayes_score: 1.68998e-05 -> 1.68998e-05
recipients: + facundobatista, tuben
2008-07-11 02:55:27facundobatistasetspambayes_score: 1.68998e-05 -> 1.68998e-05
messageid: <1215744927.47.0.792207347181.issue2674@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-11 02:55:26facundobatistalinkissue2674 messages
2008-07-11 02:55:25facundobatistacreate