Message 69521 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jjlee
Recipients	BitTorment, facundobatista, frispete, jjlee, orsenthil
Date	2008-07-10.22:35:14
SpamBayes Score	0.00045492136
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1215729316.71.0.157184400698.issue2275@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
* The patch looks like it will break code that uses .header_items(), which is not acceptable. * The patch to the docs seems to muddy the waters even further (than the current slightly murky state) about whether and why .headers is to be preferred over the methods, or vice-versa. I think .headers should remain undocumented, for the reason stated by the doctest that failed with Hans-Peter's original patch. The best course of action is debatable, but the patch is a regression in this respect, so should not be committed as-is.

* The patch looks like it will break code that uses .header_items(),
which is not acceptable.

* The patch to the docs seems to muddy the waters even further (than the
current slightly murky state) about whether and why .headers is to be
preferred over the methods, or vice-versa.  I think .headers should
remain undocumented, for the reason stated by the doctest that failed
with Hans-Peter's original patch.  The best course of action is
debatable, but the patch is a regression in this respect, so should not
be committed as-is.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-10 22:35:19	jjlee	set	spambayes_score: 0.000454921 -> 0.00045492136 recipients: + jjlee, facundobatista, orsenthil, frispete, BitTorment
2008-07-10 22:35:18	jjlee	set	spambayes_score: 0.000454921 -> 0.000454921 messageid: <1215729316.71.0.157184400698.issue2275@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-10 22:35:15	jjlee	link	issue2275 messages
2008-07-10 22:35:14	jjlee	create