Message 67676 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	terry.reedy
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, bgolemon, gvanrossum, mark, pitrou, terry.reedy
Date	2008-06-03.22:29:42
SpamBayes Score	0.020104103
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1212532184.63.0.988353439294.issue2613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Rationale for banning f(,*k): it could represent a bug (intended bare name(s) omitted) that should be flagged, a lack of clear understanding of the redundancy, or a somewhat unPythonic stylistic preference for useless redundancy. I consider the first the most likely in practice, though I also did not see the redundancy at first. Guido has used the 'likely a bug' rationale for other design decisions.

Rationale for banning f(*,**k): it could represent a bug (intended bare
name(s) omitted) that should be flagged, a lack of clear understanding
of the redundancy, or a somewhat unPythonic stylistic preference for
useless redundancy.  I consider the first the most likely in practice,
though I also did not see the redundancy at first.  Guido has used the
'likely a bug' rationale for other design decisions.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-06-03 22:29:45	terry.reedy	set	spambayes_score: 0.0201041 -> 0.020104103 recipients: + terry.reedy, gvanrossum, pitrou, mark, benjamin.peterson, bgolemon
2008-06-03 22:29:44	terry.reedy	set	spambayes_score: 0.0201041 -> 0.0201041 messageid: <1212532184.63.0.988353439294.issue2613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-06-03 22:29:43	terry.reedy	link	issue2613 messages
2008-06-03 22:29:42	terry.reedy	create