Message 67303 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	facundobatista
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, facundobatista, humitos
Date	2008-05-24.15:13:55
SpamBayes Score	0.01931684
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1211642044.23.0.565221817912.issue2888@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
It's not a 2.6 bug, as it behaves exactly as the documentation states. In Py3 it is different the result than the documentation. However, it's not clear to me if this behaviour is changed deliberately or by mistake (personally, I prefer this new way of showing it, so the documentation should be fixed). What do you think?

It's not a 2.6 bug, as it behaves exactly as the documentation states.

In Py3 it *is* different the result than the documentation. However,
it's not clear to me if this behaviour is changed deliberately or by
mistake (personally, I prefer this new way of showing it, so the
documentation should be fixed).

What do you think?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-24 15:14:06	facundobatista	set	spambayes_score: 0.0193168 -> 0.01931684 recipients: + facundobatista, alexandre.vassalotti, humitos
2008-05-24 15:14:04	facundobatista	set	spambayes_score: 0.0193168 -> 0.0193168 messageid: <1211642044.23.0.565221817912.issue2888@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-05-24 15:14:02	facundobatista	link	issue2888 messages
2008-05-24 15:14:02	facundobatista	create