Message 67243 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	fijal
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, arigo, fijal, loewis, theller
Date	2008-05-23.14:52:45
SpamBayes Score	0.07483491
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1211554370.31.0.0577085616372.issue1798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
On the one hand, no it does not hurt when we're resetting errno before any call. On the other hand if we try hard "to be like C", it's a bit strange that we always reset errno (which is on the other hand very good practice anyway). IMO it's fine to reset errno before any call, until someone can find example where it's not good. Cheers, fijal

On the one hand, no it does not hurt when we're resetting errno before
any call. On the other hand if we try hard "to be like C", it's a bit
strange that we always reset errno (which is on the other hand very good
practice anyway).

IMO it's fine to reset errno before any call, until someone can find
example where it's not good.

Cheers,
fijal

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-23 14:52:51	fijal	set	spambayes_score: 0.0748349 -> 0.07483491 recipients: + fijal, loewis, arigo, theller, amaury.forgeotdarc
2008-05-23 14:52:50	fijal	set	spambayes_score: 0.0748349 -> 0.0748349 messageid: <1211554370.31.0.0577085616372.issue1798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-05-23 14:52:49	fijal	link	issue1798 messages
2008-05-23 14:52:48	fijal	create