Message 65993 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	georg.brandl
Recipients	georg.brandl, gvanrossum, rhettinger
Date	2008-04-30.06:29:53
SpamBayes Score	0.061467983
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1209536998.92.0.675374895697.issue2719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
IMO having next() in 2.6 helps since if you use it consistently you don't have to care about calling .next() or .__next__(). Also, I don't see how this is different from having e.g. reduce() and functools.reduce() in 2.6.

IMO having next() in 2.6 helps since if you use it consistently you
don't have to care about calling .next() or .__next__().

Also, I don't see how this is different from having e.g. reduce() and
functools.reduce() in 2.6.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-30 06:30:01	georg.brandl	set	spambayes_score: 0.061468 -> 0.061467983 recipients: + georg.brandl, gvanrossum, rhettinger
2008-04-30 06:29:59	georg.brandl	set	spambayes_score: 0.061468 -> 0.061468 messageid: <1209536998.92.0.675374895697.issue2719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-30 06:29:57	georg.brandl	link	issue2719 messages
2008-04-30 06:29:54	georg.brandl	create