This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients georg.brandl, gvanrossum, rhettinger
Date 2008-04-30.06:04:30
SpamBayes Score 0.00265533
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
ISTM, the only value added by next(g) is that it replaces with 
a more conventional spelling, g.__next__().  Since 2.6 still has
(),I don't see how this backport adds value.  It does however create a 
second way to do it that will be confusing to some remaining in the 2.x 
world.  I think we should avoid double spellings in 2.6 except in cases 
where the 2-to-3 converter would need help.
Date User Action Args
2008-04-30 06:04:33rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00265533 -> 0.00265533
recipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, georg.brandl
2008-04-30 06:04:32rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00265533 -> 0.00265533
messageid: <>
2008-04-30 06:04:31rhettingerlinkissue2719 messages
2008-04-30 06:04:31rhettingercreate