Author rhettinger
Recipients georg.brandl, gvanrossum, rhettinger
Date 2008-04-30.06:04:30
SpamBayes Score 0.00265533
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1209535472.82.0.582683298988.issue2719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
ISTM, the only value added by next(g) is that it replaces g.next() with 
a more conventional spelling, g.__next__().  Since 2.6 still has g.next
(),I don't see how this backport adds value.  It does however create a 
second way to do it that will be confusing to some remaining in the 2.x 
world.  I think we should avoid double spellings in 2.6 except in cases 
where the 2-to-3 converter would need help.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-30 06:04:33rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00265533 -> 0.00265533
recipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, georg.brandl
2008-04-30 06:04:32rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00265533 -> 0.00265533
messageid: <1209535472.82.0.582683298988.issue2719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-30 06:04:31rhettingerlinkissue2719 messages
2008-04-30 06:04:31rhettingercreate