Message 65937 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan
Date	2008-04-28.21:47:53
SpamBayes Score	0.29654345
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1209419279.53.0.360841699102.issue2690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Reviewing my own patch (range-sequence.diff), I've realized that it is being a bit too clever in handling x in range(..) where x is not an integer. It seems that upon a failed PyLong_Check, range_contains should just do a linear search. This is easy to implement, but I will wait for more feedback before posting further changes.

Reviewing my own patch (range-sequence.diff), I've realized that it is 
being a bit too clever in handling x in range(..) where x is not an 
integer.  It seems that upon a failed PyLong_Check, range_contains should 
just do a linear search.  This is easy to implement, but I will wait for 
more feedback before posting further changes.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-28 21:48:00	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.296543 -> 0.29654345 recipients: + belopolsky, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan
2008-04-28 21:47:59	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.296543 -> 0.296543 messageid: <1209419279.53.0.360841699102.issue2690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-28 21:47:56	belopolsky	link	issue2690 messages
2008-04-28 21:47:54	belopolsky	create