This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jimjjewett
Recipients akuchling, jimjjewett, timehorse
Date 2008-04-24.14:23:34
SpamBayes Score 0.0568698
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> These features are to bring the Regexp code closer in line with Perl 5.10

Why 5.1 instead of 5.8 or at least 5.6?  Is it just a scope-creep issue?

> as well as add a few python-specific

because this also adds to the scope.

> 2) Make named matches direct attributes 
> of the match object; i.e. instead of'foo'), 
> one will be able to write simply

> 3) (maybe) make Match objects subscriptable, such 
> that m[n] is equivalent to and allow slicing.

(2) and (3) would both be nice, but I'm not sure it makes sense to do 
*both* instead of picking one.

> 5) Add a well-formed, python-specific comment modifier, 
> e.g. (?P#...);  

[handles parens in comments without turning on verbose, but is slower]

Why?  It adds another incompatibility, so it has to be very useful or 
clear.  What exactly is the advantage over just turning on verbose?

> 9) C-Engine speed-ups. ...
> a number of Macros are being eliminated where appropriate.

Be careful on those, particular on str/unicode and different compile options.
Date User Action Args
2008-04-24 14:23:36jimjjewettsetspambayes_score: 0.0568698 -> 0.0568698
recipients: + jimjjewett, akuchling, timehorse
2008-04-24 14:23:36jimjjewettsetspambayes_score: 0.0568698 -> 0.0568698
messageid: <>
2008-04-24 14:23:35jimjjewettlinkissue2636 messages
2008-04-24 14:23:34jimjjewettcreate