This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients bobatkins, loewis, sergiodj
Date 2008-04-10.21:17:58
SpamBayes Score 0.0360611
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <47FE8404.8070007@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1207859539.85.0.569340860718.issue1628484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Thanks for your quick answer. I'd like to know what can we do to push
> this patch into upstream. Does the fact that the patch is posted in a
> bug report (and not in a developer's mailing list) is slowing down the
> reviewing process?

No, it's the lack of reviewers in the first place that is slowing all
patches, not just this one.

I'm skeptical about this patch. We already have BASECFLAGS, and blindly
copying  @CFLAGS@ into CFLAGS might break things if configure also
decides to add the same or conflicting flags.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-10 21:17:59loewissetspambayes_score: 0.0360611 -> 0.0360611
recipients: + loewis, bobatkins, sergiodj
2008-04-10 21:17:58loewislinkissue1628484 messages
2008-04-10 21:17:58loewiscreate