Message 65117 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, twouters
Date	2008-04-07.20:15:11
SpamBayes Score	0.00939377
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<d38f5330804071315y8a05763m256dc76c5ef4d47f@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Wouters <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > .. The order of evaluation is the same, the > BUILD_SET implementation just hashes the evaluated items in a different > order. You can't really rely on that particular order as it's tied > closely to the stack representation CPython uses. I agree and that's why I said the difference in behavior is "subtle" and my example is "contrived." However, I believe Raymond expressed a similar concern in msg63065.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Wouters <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> .. The order of evaluation is the same, the
>  BUILD_SET implementation just hashes the evaluated items in a different
>  order. You can't really rely on that particular order as it's tied
>  closely to the stack representation CPython uses.

I agree and that's why I said the difference in behavior is "subtle"
and my example is "contrived."   However, I believe Raymond expressed
a similar concern in msg63065.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-07 20:15:12	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.00939377 -> 0.00939377 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl
2008-04-07 20:15:11	belopolsky	link	issue2292 messages
2008-04-07 20:15:11	belopolsky	create