Message 64642 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	anthonybaxter, christian.heimes, jafo, janixia, jhylton, loewis, pitrou, tim.peters
Date	2008-03-28.18:09:49
SpamBayes Score	0.023466773
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1206727793.0.0.790985148086.issue815646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
This is a preliminary patch which shows how things might be done better. It only addresses close(), seek() and dealloc right now. However, as mentioned in test_close_open_seek, if I raise the number of workers, I get crashes (while test_close_open is fine). Perhaps fseek() in the glibc is thread unsafe when operating on the same file descriptor?

This is a preliminary patch which shows how things might be done better.
It only addresses close(), seek() and dealloc right now. However, as
mentioned in test_close_open_seek, if I raise the number of workers, I
get crashes (while test_close_open is fine). Perhaps fseek() in the
glibc is thread unsafe when operating on the same file descriptor?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-03-28 18:09:53	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.0234668 -> 0.023466773 recipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, jhylton, anthonybaxter, jafo, janixia, christian.heimes
2008-03-28 18:09:53	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.0234668 -> 0.0234668 messageid: <1206727793.0.0.790985148086.issue815646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-03-28 18:09:51	pitrou	link	issue815646 messages
2008-03-28 18:09:51	pitrou	create