This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients loewis, rhettinger, scoder
Date 2008-03-24.08:04:31
SpamBayes Score 0.005565977
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1206345874.1.0.941445011989.issue1162363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Overall, I'm not in favor of the patch or the basic idea.  The heapq 
module is somewhat usable as-is with apps typically inserting tuples 
linking a priority level and a record.  

Also, the attached code is not yet mature, nor does it evidence 
compelling use cases or user demand.  This may make a good ASPN recipe 
but would be premature for inclusion in the standard library.

One quick comment on the API, it would be better to have just a key 
function and to drop the cmp function as Python itself has done 
throughout the language in Py3.0.

Recommend rejecting the feature request, leaving the module as clean as 
possible.  If the code is published separately (perhaps as an ASPN 
recipe or third-party module), it may yet mature and gather a fan club.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-03-24 08:04:34rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00556598 -> 0.005565977
recipients: + rhettinger, loewis, scoder
2008-03-24 08:04:34rhettingersetspambayes_score: 0.00556598 -> 0.00556598
messageid: <1206345874.1.0.941445011989.issue1162363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-03-24 08:04:33rhettingerlinkissue1162363 messages
2008-03-24 08:04:31rhettingercreate