Author janssen
Recipients giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, iElectric, janssen, roberte
Date 2008-03-20.03:56:46
SpamBayes Score 0.0
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4b3e516a0803192056u8e35cd3q11ba362b730d231@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1205959612.68.0.754299368352.issue2054@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Once I've got JCC working, and finished the SSL work for 2.6.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Giampaolo Rodola' <billiejoex@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
>
> > As you point out, the other classes should be fixed.  The old
> > client-side protocol was never very well thought out, IMHO.
> > Continuing to propagate it would be a mistake.
>
> Ok, how do you think it would have be modified?
> Could you provide an example or a new patch?
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2054>
> __________________________________
>
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed janssen, 2008-03-20.03:56:46
History
Date User Action Args
2008-07-26 13:49:14georg.brandlsetspambayes_score: 0.840062 -> 0.0
2008-03-20 03:56:47janssensetspambayes_score: 0.840062 -> 0.840062
recipients: + janssen, gregory.p.smith, giampaolo.rodola, roberte, iElectric
2008-03-20 03:56:46janssenlinkissue2054 messages
2008-03-20 03:56:46janssencreate