Message 62912 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	maltehelmert
Recipients	belopolsky, christian.heimes, gvanrossum, maltehelmert, pitrou, rbp
Date	2008-02-24.15:46:21
SpamBayes Score	0.04553129
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1203867982.98.0.565361507457.issue1040026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Tiran, that's the general approach we should follow, yes. But the people who discussed this on #python-dev all felt a bit queasy about the "60" fallback -- this is what caused the bug in the first place on Guido's and my machine. (A value of 60 was assumed; 100 would have been correct.) Having no such fallback would be preferable, unless it's necessary. You use Windows, right? Can you test if that fallback is necessary there? As far as I can tell, it should not be necessary on a more UNIX-ish system.

Tiran, that's the general approach we should follow, yes.

But the people who discussed this on #python-dev all felt a bit queasy
about the "60" fallback -- this is what caused the bug in the first
place on Guido's and my machine. (A value of 60 was assumed; 100 would
have been correct.) Having no such fallback would be preferable, unless
it's necessary.

You use Windows, right? Can you test if that fallback is necessary
there? As far as I can tell, it should not be necessary on a more
UNIX-ish system.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-24 15:46:23	maltehelmert	set	spambayes_score: 0.0455313 -> 0.04553129 recipients: + maltehelmert, gvanrossum, belopolsky, pitrou, christian.heimes, rbp
2008-02-24 15:46:23	maltehelmert	set	spambayes_score: 0.0455313 -> 0.0455313 messageid: <1203867982.98.0.565361507457.issue1040026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-24 15:46:22	maltehelmert	link	issue1040026 messages
2008-02-24 15:46:22	maltehelmert	create