Message 62870 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky, gvanrossum, maltehelmert, pitrou, rbp
Date	2008-02-24.02:54:08
SpamBayes Score	0.18047753
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1203821649.49.0.868011934397.issue1040026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Aha, I should read my own sources: "The value shall not change during the lifetime of the calling process, [XSI] except that sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) may return different values before and after a call to setrlimit() which changes the RLIMIT_NOFILE soft limit." <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sysconf.html> So we can consider making ticks_per_sec static and initializing it in posixinit.

Aha, I should read my own sources:

"The value shall not change during the lifetime of the calling process, 
[XSI]   except that sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) may return different values 
before and after a call to setrlimit() which changes the RLIMIT_NOFILE 
soft limit." 
<http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sysconf.html>

So we can consider making ticks_per_sec static and initializing it in 
posixinit.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-24 02:54:09	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.180478 -> 0.18047753 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, maltehelmert, pitrou, rbp
2008-02-24 02:54:09	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.180478 -> 0.180478 messageid: <1203821649.49.0.868011934397.issue1040026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-24 02:54:08	belopolsky	link	issue1040026 messages
2008-02-24 02:54:08	belopolsky	create