➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author janssen
Recipients christian.heimes, dugang@188.com, gvanrossum, janssen
Date 2008-02-02.02:05:24
SpamBayes Score 1.9787e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4b3e516a0802011805t30767ev944d833542b6c473@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1201881625.06.0.462120148755.issue1978@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
OK, I'll read it more carefully and compare it to the 2.6 version of the
code.

Bill

On Feb 1, 2008 8:00 AM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Guido van Rossum added the comment:
>
> I think it's worth applying this to 2.5.2 even if the patch is dead
> after that.  More unittests are definitely in order.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +gvanrossum
> priority: low -> normal
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1978>
> __________________________________
>
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed janssen, 2008-02-02.02:05:23
History
Date User Action Args
2008-02-02 02:05:26janssensetspambayes_score: 1.9787e-05 -> 1.9787e-05
recipients: + janssen, gvanrossum, christian.heimes, dugang@188.com
2008-02-02 02:05:24janssenlinkissue1978 messages
2008-02-02 02:05:24janssencreate