Author amaury.forgeotdarc
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum
Date 2008-01-17.23:23:38
SpamBayes Score 0.00512642
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1200612219.88.0.401834234216.issue1856@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> That doesn't matter.  PyGILState_Ensure needs to remain valid
> *forever*. Only once the process is completely gone can we be sure 
> it won't be called.

We could apply the same idea: when exiting, PyGILState_Ensure() blocks
forever, except for the main thread of course.

Note that all this state must be restartable: after Py_Finalize(), it
should be possible to call Py_Initialize() again. This seems to raise
the score of the "exit_thread" approach.
I don't know if multiple interpreters are well supported, though.
Is there somewhere a list of use cases, or a test script that can
exercise this?
History
Date User Action Args
2008-01-17 23:23:40amaury.forgeotdarcsetspambayes_score: 0.00512642 -> 0.00512642
recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus
2008-01-17 23:23:39amaury.forgeotdarcsetspambayes_score: 0.00512642 -> 0.00512642
messageid: <1200612219.88.0.401834234216.issue1856@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-01-17 23:23:38amaury.forgeotdarclinkissue1856 messages
2008-01-17 23:23:38amaury.forgeotdarccreate