➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, ncoghlan
Date 2007-12-02.20:09:44
SpamBayes Score 0.00013158943
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <ca471dc20712021209sb7473f4k908e96d06217c2d6@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1196604108.61.0.966388731293.issue1487@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Great, now check it in!

On Dec 2, 2007 6:01 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan added the comment:
>
> Posted v2 of the patch, which fixes the problem Guido noted, and
> improved the tests to make sure __package__ is being set correctly.
> There's also now an explicit test for using -m on a module inside a
> package (which proved harder to write than I expected - it isn't easy to
> fiddle with sys.path when the subprocess is running python with the -E
> flag!).
>
> Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8852/pep_366_v2.diff
>
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1487>
> __________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2007-12-02 20:09:44gvanrossumsetspambayes_score: 0.000131589 -> 0.00013158943
recipients: + gvanrossum, ncoghlan
2007-12-02 20:09:44gvanrossumlinkissue1487 messages
2007-12-02 20:09:44gvanrossumcreate