Author astrand
Recipients JosephArmbruster, astrand, christian.heimes, joearmbruster
Date 2007-11-21.07:48:01
SpamBayes Score 0.168145
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1195631282.15.0.38320469007.issue1475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think there's some confusion in this bug. The report on
http://pastebin.com/fa947767 indicates a problem in test_popen. This is
a test for os.popen() and it does not have anything to do with the
subprocess module. I believe it is test_popen.py that should be fixed. 

In general, quoting in Windows is very difficult. The documentation
quoted in msg57701 might be correct for some modern version of Windows,
but not for, say, command.com on an older Windows version. I believe the
subprocess is fairly complete when it comes to quoting etc, so changes
should be avoided if possible. 

Since this bug is not about the subprocess module, I've re-assigned to
nobody, hope this is OK.
History
Date User Action Args
2007-11-21 07:48:02astrandsetspambayes_score: 0.168145 -> 0.168145
recipients: + astrand, joearmbruster, christian.heimes, JosephArmbruster
2007-11-21 07:48:02astrandsetspambayes_score: 0.168145 -> 0.168145
messageid: <1195631282.15.0.38320469007.issue1475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-11-21 07:48:02astrandlinkissue1475 messages
2007-11-21 07:48:01astrandcreate