➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jgsack
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, ggenellina, gvanrossum, jgsack
Date 2007-11-15.08:40:49
SpamBayes Score 0.41710442
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1195116050.34.0.289236617367.issue1328@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
re: msg57041, I'm sorry if I gave the wrong impression about interacting 
with other programs. I started this feature request with some half-baked 
thinking, which I tried to revise in my second post.

Anyway I'm most interested right now in lobbying for a change to utf_8 to 
accept input with an _optional_ BOM-signature so that the input part would 
behave just like utf_8_sig, where the BOM-sig is already optional (on 
input).

In the process of trying to come up with a test and patch for this, I 
discovered a bug in utf_8_sig (issue #1444 http://bugs.python.org/
issue1444).

After there is some action on that I will return here to continue with 
utf_8, which I have convinced myself (anyways) is a reasonable and safe 
revision.

..jim
History
Date User Action Args
2007-11-15 08:40:50jgsacksetspambayes_score: 0.417104 -> 0.41710442
recipients: + jgsack, gvanrossum, ggenellina, Rhamphoryncus
2007-11-15 08:40:50jgsacksetspambayes_score: 0.417104 -> 0.417104
messageid: <1195116050.34.0.289236617367.issue1328@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-11-15 08:40:50jgsacklinkissue1328 messages
2007-11-15 08:40:49jgsackcreate