Message 56536 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	theller
Recipients	gvanrossum, theller
Date	2007-10-18.17:49:35
SpamBayes Score	0.060195133
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<47179CAB.7050701@ctypes.org>
In-reply-to	<1192726897.32.0.660320436746.issue1295@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> > This is tough. On the one hand you are right that different classes that > > have different formatException() methods aren't treated correctly; on > > the other hand I think the caching is important for other cases where > > there are multiple loggers all using the default formatException(). > > > > I recommend that instead of getting rid of the cache, you fix your class > > by overriding format() to reset record.ex c_text and then calling the > > base class format() method. That is what I have been doing although I think that I have to reset record.exc_text also AFTER the call to format() for the following handlers, if any. So, should this issue be closed as 'wont fix' ?

> > This is tough. On the one hand you are right that different classes that
> > have different formatException() methods aren't treated correctly; on
> > the other hand I think the caching is important for other cases where
> > there are multiple loggers all using the default formatException().
> > 
> > I recommend that instead of getting rid of the cache, you fix your class
> > by overriding format() to reset record.ex c_text and then calling the
> > base class format() method.

That is what I have been doing although I think that I have to reset
record.exc_text also AFTER the call to format() for the following
handlers, if any.

So, should this issue be closed as 'wont fix' ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-10-18 17:49:35	theller	set	spambayes_score: 0.0601951 -> 0.060195133 recipients: + theller, gvanrossum
2007-10-18 17:49:35	theller	link	issue1295 messages
2007-10-18 17:49:35	theller	create