Ahh, my mistake then.  I misunderstood what was going on.

Thanks,
 Dan

On 9/4/07, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>
> Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
>
> Why do you think so? The documentation is correct as it stands;
> dummy_threading should be used when thread is not present, not when
> threading is not present (as threading will always be present, it just
> won't import when thread is not present).
>
> ----------
> nosy: +loewis
> resolution:  -> invalid
> status: open -> closed
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1103>
> __________________________________
>