Message 51500 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	theller
Recipients
Date	2007-01-09.20:01:18
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
mkam, I was eventually able to test out your patch. I have virtual machines running Freebsd6.0, NetBSD3.0, and OpenBSD3.9. The output from "print find_library('c'), find_library('m')" on these systems is as follows: FreeBSD6.0: libc.so.6, libm.so.4 NetBSD3.0: libc.so.12, libm.so.0 OpenBSD3.9: libc.so.39.0, libm.so.2.1 If you think this is what is expected, I'm happy to apply the patch. Or is there further work needed on it? (Do you still need the output of "ldconfig -r" or whatever?)

mkam, I was eventually able to test out your patch.
I have virtual machines running Freebsd6.0, NetBSD3.0, and OpenBSD3.9.
The output from "print find_library('c'), find_library('m')" on these systems is as follows:

FreeBSD6.0:  libc.so.6, libm.so.4
NetBSD3.0: libc.so.12, libm.so.0
OpenBSD3.9: libc.so.39.0, libm.so.2.1

If you think this is what is expected, I'm happy to apply the patch.  Or is there further work needed on it?  (Do you still need the output of "ldconfig -r" or whatever?)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 15:55:40	admin	link	issue1610795 messages
2007-08-23 15:55:40	admin	create