This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mkam
Recipients
Date 2006-12-11.10:10:00
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Hm, I did not know that OpenBSD is still using two version numbers for shared library.
(I conclude that from the "libc.so.39.0" in the previous followup. Btw FreeBSD has used
a MAJOR.MINOR[.DEWEY] scheme during the ancient days of the aout executable format.)
Unfortunately my freebsd patch has the assumption of a single version number built in;
more specifically the
  cmp(* map(lambda x: int(x.split('.')[-1]), (a, b)))
is supposed to sort based an the last dot separated field. I guess that OpenBSD system
does not have another libc, at least none with a minor > 0. ;-)
Thomas, can you mail me the output of "ldconfig -r"? I will refine the patch then,
doing a more general sort algorithm; i.e. sort by all trailing /(\.\d+)+/ fields. Said output from NetBSD welcome too. DragonflyBSD should be no problem since it is a fork of FreeBSD 4.8, but what looks its sys.platform like?
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 15:55:39adminlinkissue1610795 messages
2007-08-23 15:55:39admincreate