Message45982
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
Brett, it looks like self.__stderr is never given a value -- the
__init__ code here binds a *local* vrbl __stderr to
_sys.stderr. If so, that tells me the bulk of the patch hasn't
actually been exercised (else it would have raised
AttributeError trying to print to self.__stderr).
To simplify it more, I think it would be fine to ignore
sys.tracebacklimit. A Google search shows that virtually the
only use of sys.tracebacklimit in real life is the use made of it
here: passively accessing its value to simulate what it would
have done if anyone had ever bothered to set it (of which I
couldn't find even one example). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 15:37:45 | admin | link | issue954922 messages |
2007-08-23 15:37:45 | admin | create | |
|