➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author oconnor663
Recipients Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn, christian.heimes, corona10, gregory.p.smith, jstasiak, kmaork, larry, lemburg, mgorny, oconnor663, xtreak
Date 2022-03-24.15:58:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1648137512.38.0.0156704028935.issue39298@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Truncated sha512 (sha512-256) typically performs 40% faster than sha256 on X86_64.

Without hardware acceleration, yes. But because SHA-NI includes only SHA-1 and SHA-256, and not SHA-512, it's no longer a level playing field. OpenSSL's SHA-512 and SHA-512/256 both get about 797 MB/s on my machine.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-03-24 15:58:32oconnor663setrecipients: + oconnor663, lemburg, gregory.p.smith, larry, christian.heimes, mgorny, Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn, jstasiak, corona10, xtreak, kmaork
2022-03-24 15:58:32oconnor663setmessageid: <1648137512.38.0.0156704028935.issue39298@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-03-24 15:58:32oconnor663linkissue39298 messages
2022-03-24 15:58:32oconnor663create