Message 415749 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	methane
Recipients	brandtbucher, christian.heimes, malin, methane, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2022-03-22.07:48:09
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1647935289.22.0.221112060191.issue46864@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Since the hash is randomized, using hash(bytes) for such use case is not recommended. User should use stable hash functions instead. I agree that there is few use cases this change cause performance regression. But it is really few compared to overhead of adding 8bytes for all bytes instances.

Since the hash is randomized, using hash(bytes) for such use case is not recommended. User should use stable hash functions instead.

I agree that there is few use cases this change cause performance regression. But it is really few compared to overhead of adding 8bytes for all bytes instances.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2022-03-22 07:48:09	methane	set	recipients: + methane, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, malin, brandtbucher
2022-03-22 07:48:09	methane	set	messageid: <1647935289.22.0.221112060191.issue46864@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-03-22 07:48:09	methane	link	issue46864 messages
2022-03-22 07:48:09	methane	create