This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gregory.p.smith
Recipients corona10, gregory.p.smith, ned.deily, ronaldoussoren
Date 2022-03-20.21:43:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1647812616.31.0.387532827765.issue47064@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Definitely not an OS specific concept.  Big.little configs are all over the place on all OSes and architectures these days.  With a variety of ways OSes are experimenting with scheduling for them (nevermind that Android and iOS have been doing this for a decade).

from scheduling policies such as users, cgroup membership, container membership, group membership, nice level, to QoS attributes as you mention here...

If a given OS has specific APIs we should expose them via the os or _thread modules as appropriate.  But unless multiple OSes congeal around common concepts, there isn't much we can do for abstraction.  Perhaps a generic way to supply a generic OS specific settings instance to threading.Thread for implementation defined configuration purposes before Thread.start() is called.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-03-20 21:43:36gregory.p.smithsetrecipients: + gregory.p.smith, ronaldoussoren, ned.deily, corona10
2022-03-20 21:43:36gregory.p.smithsetmessageid: <1647812616.31.0.387532827765.issue47064@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-03-20 21:43:36gregory.p.smithlinkissue47064 messages
2022-03-20 21:43:36gregory.p.smithcreate